‘FBI DOES IT TOO’: Media Tries to Downplay SPLC Indictment

The Justice Department has indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center — one of the American left's most powerful and weaponized organizations — on charges that it allegedly distributed more than $3 million in fraudulent payments to racist groups including the Ku Klux Klan from 2014 to 2023. It is one of the most explosive institutional indictments in recent memory. And if you rely on legacy media for your news, you may have heard almost nothing about it.

An Alabama-based grand jury returned the federal indictment Tuesday, with the DOJ detailing how the SPLC allegedly operated a "covert network" dating back to the 1980s comprised of individuals "who were either associated with violent and extremist groups … or who had infiltrated violent extremist groups at the SPLC's direction." The kicker: the SPLC purportedly never told its donors that their contributions were being used to fund the very racist extremists the organization claimed to be fighting.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche put it plainly: "The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence."


The Organization That Built Its Empire Labeling Others

The significance of this indictment cannot be overstated. For decades, the SPLC wielded its "hate group" designation as a political cudgel, branding mainstream conservative and Christian organizations alongside actual neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups on its widely cited lists. The designation has been used to justify deplatforming, defunding, and delegitimizing organizations across the conservative movement — including, as this publication has previously reported, targeting The Federalist for publishing a state attorney general's speech.

Media outlets, corporate HR departments, and left-wing activists treated the SPLC's designations as authoritative — a stamp of approval from a supposedly nonpartisan civil rights watchdog. The indictment alleges that the organization was, the entire time, secretly funding the very kinds of extremist networks it was publicly denouncing.

"Manufacturing racism to justify its existence." Four words that encapsulate what critics of the SPLC have been arguing for years — and what a federal grand jury has now found sufficient probable cause to charge.


Media Runs Interference

What happened next was entirely predictable and deeply revealing. Rather than reporting the indictment straightforwardly, the legacy media went to work protecting one of its ideological allies.
USA Today ran a piece by national correspondent Will Carless headlined "Key civil rights group indicted for paying informants. But FBI does it too" — a framing designed to neutralize the story by normalizing the SPLC's alleged conduct as equivalent to standard federal law enforcement practices. Never mind that the FBI discloses its informant relationships in legal proceedings and does not secretly route donor money to racist organizations while simultaneously denouncing those organizations on its public website.

The New York Times ran the headline "Justice Dept. Charges Prominent Civil Rights Group With Financial Crimes" — a headline that manages to omit entirely the bombshell detail that the SPLC allegedly funneled money to the KKK. Reporter Devlin Barrett's article buried criticisms of the SPLC's targeting of conservative groups in the familiar "Republicans pounce!" framing, characterizing the entirely legitimate and well-documented concerns about the SPLC's smear operations as merely partisan sniping.

CBS News characterized the indicted organization as a good-faith "nonprofit" best known for "investigating the Ku Klux Klan" — as if the organization that allegedly paid the Klan's leadership is primarily defined by its opposition to it. The CBS piece included 10 additional paragraphs of padding before getting to any substantive criticism of the SPLC, and it managed to frame conservative critics of the organization as, implicitly, sympathetic to the extremist groups the SPLC supposedly monitors.


Ignored Altogether

Several major networks didn't bother covering the indictment at all, according to the Media Research Center. The MRC's Free Speech America reported that Google News did not run a single story about the SPLC indictment in its top 20 results the morning after the charges were announced — instead promoting NPR stories about, among other subjects, a naked mole rat colony and a golden helmet. MSN and Yahoo similarly ran other crime stories — including a CNN piece smearing FBI Director Kash Patel — rather than the SPLC charges.

This is not negligence. It is a coordinated editorial choice by platforms and outlets that have relied on the SPLC's designations to justify silencing conservative voices. The organization they promoted as an authoritative arbiter of extremism has now been indicted for funding actual extremists, and they would prefer their audiences not know about it.


Decades of Damage

The SPLC's alleged scheme — manufacturing extremist threats to solicit donor dollars, while secretly funding those same extremists through a covert network — represents one of the most cynical nonprofit frauds in American history if the charges are proven. But the collateral damage extends far beyond the financial victims. Every conservative organization wrongly branded a "hate group" by the SPLC, every individual whose reputation was destroyed by the designation, every corporation that cut ties with a legitimate group on the SPLC's say-so — all of them were, allegedly, victimized by an organization running a racket.

The SPLC has long operated under the protection of a media establishment that shared its ideological objectives and was happy to take its designations at face value without scrutiny. Tuesday's indictment is a long-overdue reckoning. The media's response — downplay, deflect, ignore — tells you everything you need to know about whose interests they are actually serving.

Acting Attorney General Blanche's four-word summary should be the headline everywhere. It is not. That silence is the real story.

The SPLC has not issued a public response to the indictment at the time of publication. The case is proceeding in federal court in Alabama.

 
by is licensed under