Democratic impeachment case collapses under weight of time

As the House and Senate continue their bitter struggle over the coming impeachment trial of President Trump, a judge in the District of Columbia issued an opinion that was largely lost in the crush of New Years stories. The opinion could loom large in the Senate trial, however, and one line in particular, which states “the House clearly has no intention of pursuing” the witness, may be repeated like a mantra by the Trump defense team.

The witness was Charles Kupperman, a deputy to former national security adviser John Bolton. Other than Bolton himself, Kupperman is one of the officials most likely to have direct knowledge of an alleged quid pro quo on aid to Ukraine. After subpoenaing him last fall, the House withdrew its request before the court could rule on compelling his testimony for the record. The House also decided not to subpoena Bolton or any other key witnesses in the administration. Judge Richard Leon dismissed the case before New Years Eve with a hint of frustration, if not bewilderment, that the House did not seem interested in hearing from a possible eyewitness. Historically, that lack of attention in not only witnesses but also a triable case will remain one of the most baffling blunders of this impeachment.

When I testified in the House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing, I cited this case in my criticism of the pledge by Democrats to impeach Trump by Christmas despite a very incomplete record. While I opposed some of the proposed articles of impeachment that were subsequently dropped by the panel, I said Trump could be legitimately impeached on abuse of power and obstruction of justice if the House could establish such violations. But the House refused to wait just a couple months to build a much stronger case to remove Trump. In the mad rush to push impeachment, Democrats could not have made it easier for his team.


Securing an impeachment so fast does not earn you a historic prize. It simply earns you a historic failure. By not seeking to compel numerous key witnesses, the House now relies on the Senate to complete its case. Since the House has maintained that the record overwhelmingly proves that Trump is guilty, the Senate could simply try the case on the record supplied by the House. Indeed, in the 1999 impeachment of President Clinton, Senate Democrats, including Minority Leader Charles Schumer, fought against any witnesses and sought a summary vote without a trial.

I was particularly concerned about moving forward by Christmas on the second article of alleged obstruction of Congress. The House elected to push through impeachment with an abbreviated period of roughly three months and declared any delay by Trump, even to seek judicial reviews, to be a high crime and misdemeanor. The administration is currently in court challenging demands for witnesses and documents. Just a couple weeks ago, the Supreme Court accepted one such case for review then stayed the lower court decisions ordering the production of the tax and finance records of Trump. The House impeached Trump before that court or other federal courts could rule on the merits of claims of presidential privileges and immunities. Both Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon had been able to take such challenges to the Supreme Court before they faced impeachment.


Read More...
 

 Read more at The Hill

Current News

State AGs urge Senate to reject impeachment in stinging letter: 'A dangerous historical precedent'

State AGs urge Senate to reject impeachment in stinging letter: 'A dangerous historical precedent'

The attorneys general of 21 states have come forward with a blistering rebuke of the impeachment of President Trump...  Read more

Senate Democrats privately mull witness trade in impeachment trial: A Biden for Bolton
  • MSN
  • 01/22/2020 12:00 AM

Senate Democrats privately mull witness trade in impeachment trial: A Biden for Bolton

Several Senate Democrats are privately discussing the possibility of calling Republicans’ bluff on witnesses...  Read more

Jeff Bezos hack: Amazon boss's phone 'hacked by Saudi crown prince'

Jeff Bezos hack: Amazon boss's phone 'hacked by Saudi crown prince'

The Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos had his mobile phone “hacked” in 2018 after receiving...  Read more

Standoff: U.S. troops block Russian forces from capturing Syrian oil field

Standoff: U.S. troops block Russian forces from capturing Syrian oil field

U.S. troops last weekend reportedly found themselves in a standoff with Russian forces trying to gain access to key oil fields in northeastern Syria...  Read more

Jeffrey Epstein had burst capillaries in his eyeballs after he died which indicates he was STRANGLED

Jeffrey Epstein had burst capillaries in his eyeballs after he died which indicates he was STRANGLED

A forensic pathologist has claimed that Jeffrey Epstein was likely murdered and did not hang himself because...  Read more

Historic Trump impeachment trial begins in US Senate

Historic Trump impeachment trial begins in US Senate

The historic impeachment trial of Donald Trump began in a bitterly divided Senate on Thursday with a solemn reading to...  Read more