Democratic impeachment case collapses under weight of time

As the House and Senate continue their bitter struggle over the coming impeachment trial of President Trump, a judge in the District of Columbia issued an opinion that was largely lost in the crush of New Years stories. The opinion could loom large in the Senate trial, however, and one line in particular, which states “the House clearly has no intention of pursuing” the witness, may be repeated like a mantra by the Trump defense team.

The witness was Charles Kupperman, a deputy to former national security adviser John Bolton. Other than Bolton himself, Kupperman is one of the officials most likely to have direct knowledge of an alleged quid pro quo on aid to Ukraine. After subpoenaing him last fall, the House withdrew its request before the court could rule on compelling his testimony for the record. The House also decided not to subpoena Bolton or any other key witnesses in the administration. Judge Richard Leon dismissed the case before New Years Eve with a hint of frustration, if not bewilderment, that the House did not seem interested in hearing from a possible eyewitness. Historically, that lack of attention in not only witnesses but also a triable case will remain one of the most baffling blunders of this impeachment.

When I testified in the House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing, I cited this case in my criticism of the pledge by Democrats to impeach Trump by Christmas despite a very incomplete record. While I opposed some of the proposed articles of impeachment that were subsequently dropped by the panel, I said Trump could be legitimately impeached on abuse of power and obstruction of justice if the House could establish such violations. But the House refused to wait just a couple months to build a much stronger case to remove Trump. In the mad rush to push impeachment, Democrats could not have made it easier for his team.


Securing an impeachment so fast does not earn you a historic prize. It simply earns you a historic failure. By not seeking to compel numerous key witnesses, the House now relies on the Senate to complete its case. Since the House has maintained that the record overwhelmingly proves that Trump is guilty, the Senate could simply try the case on the record supplied by the House. Indeed, in the 1999 impeachment of President Clinton, Senate Democrats, including Minority Leader Charles Schumer, fought against any witnesses and sought a summary vote without a trial.

I was particularly concerned about moving forward by Christmas on the second article of alleged obstruction of Congress. The House elected to push through impeachment with an abbreviated period of roughly three months and declared any delay by Trump, even to seek judicial reviews, to be a high crime and misdemeanor. The administration is currently in court challenging demands for witnesses and documents. Just a couple weeks ago, the Supreme Court accepted one such case for review then stayed the lower court decisions ordering the production of the tax and finance records of Trump. The House impeached Trump before that court or other federal courts could rule on the merits of claims of presidential privileges and immunities. Both Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon had been able to take such challenges to the Supreme Court before they faced impeachment.


Read More...
 

 Read more at The Hill

Current News

BREAKING: Hunter Biden Received Millions From Wife Of Ex-Moscow Mayor, Paid Suspects Allegedly Tied To Trafficking, Had Contacts With Individuals Linked To Chinese Military, Senate Report Alleges

BREAKING: Hunter Biden Received Millions From Wife Of Ex-Moscow Mayor, Paid Suspects Allegedly Tied To Trafficking, Had Contacts With Individuals Linked To Chinese Military, Senate Report Alleges

A bombshell report from the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) and the Committee on Finance makes a series of damning new allegations against Hunter Biden, the son of Democrat presidential nominee.  Read more

Kayleigh McEnany Chops Up CNN’s Jim Acosta On Live TV

Kayleigh McEnany Chops Up CNN’s Jim Acosta On Live TV

Kayleigh McEnany always brings the receipts. With her perfectly organized binder full of every quote and fact she needs in a given day, the Press Secretary always gets the better of a media that things they are far more clever than they are. You’d think they’d learn, but I guess not.  Read more

There is No Downside To Trump Nominating Amy Coney Barrett

There is No Downside To Trump Nominating Amy Coney Barrett

This election was always going to be about culture. Treat the election as a referendum on cultural issues and lean in, Mr. President.  Read more

RNC Runs Brutal Ad of Democrats Demanding SCOTUS Seat Be Filled

RNC Runs Brutal Ad of Democrats Demanding SCOTUS Seat Be Filled

As Democrats continue their panic over the latest vacancy on the Supreme Court, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi threatening impeachment if President Trump dares to move forward with his constitutional duty to fill the position, the Republican National Committee is holding the left accountable to their own standard.  Read more

Newt Gingrich Puts Kamala Harris In a No-Win Situation Over Amy Coney Barrett

Newt Gingrich Puts Kamala Harris In a No-Win Situation Over Amy Coney Barrett

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich foresees President Donald Trump nominating Amy Coney Barrett as the woman to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, but having the tactical mind he does, Gingrich wants to make it clear that this is more of a problem for the Democrats than they think.  Read more

'O.C.' actress Samaire Armstrong voices support for Trump, says 'far-left mob' has silenced Americans

'O.C.' actress Samaire Armstrong voices support for Trump, says 'far-left mob' has silenced Americans

'I'm voting #Trump2020,' she declares online  Read more