Elizabeth Warren’s Batty Plan to Nationalize . . . Everything

Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts has one-upped socialists Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: She proposes to nationalize every major business in the United States of America. If successful, it would constitute the largest seizure of private property in human history.

Warren’s proposal is dishonestly called the “Accountable Capitalism Act.” Accountable to whom? you might ask. That’s a reasonable question. The answer is — as it always is — accountable to politicians, who desire to put the assets and productivity of private businesses under political discipline for their own selfish ends. It is remarkable that people who are most keenly attuned to the self-interest of CEOs and shareholders and the ways in which that self-interest influences their decisions apparently believe that members of the House, senators, presidents, regulators, Cabinet secretaries, and agency chiefs somehow are liberated from self-interest when they take office through some kind of miracle of transcendence.

Under Senator Warren’s proposal, no business with more than $1 billion in revenue would be permitted to legally operate without permission from the federal government. The federal government would then dictate to these businesses the composition of their boards, the details of internal corporate governance, compensation practices, personnel policies, and much more. Naturally, their political activities would be restricted, too. Senator Warren’s proposal entails the wholesale expropriation of private enterprise in the United States, and nothing less. It is unconstitutional, unethical, immoral, irresponsible, and — not to put too fine a point on it — utterly bonkers.

It is also cynical. Senator Warren is many things: a crass opportunist, intellectually bankrupt, personally vapid, a peddler of witless self-help books, etc. But she is not stupid. She knows that this is a go-nowhere proposition, that she will be spared by the Republican legislative majority from the ignominy that would ensue from the wholehearted pursuit of this daft program. It is in reality only a means of staking out for purely strategic reasons the most radical corner for her 2020 run at the Democratic presidential nomination. The Democratic party in 2018, like the Republican primary electorate in 2016, is out for blood and desirous of confrontation. So Senator Warren is running this red flag up the flagpole to see who salutes.

To propose such a thing for sincere reasons would be ghastly stupidity. To propose this program for narrowly self-serving political reasons is the sort of thing that would end a political career in a sane and self-respecting state, which Massachusetts plainly is not and has not been for some time.

 Read more at National Review

Thumbnail Photo Credit: N/A by N/A is licensed under N/A N/A

Current News

Biden prepares to meet with Xi Jinping amid 'concerns' over China's actions

Biden prepares to meet with Xi Jinping amid 'concerns' over China's actions

Monday's virtual meeting will be the third engagement between President Biden and President Xi since February.  Read more

Rising inflation sees Maine, New Englanders blast Biden administration and ‘rich people trying to get richer’

Rising inflation sees Maine, New Englanders blast Biden administration and ‘rich people trying to get richer’

Mainers worry as home heating oil, gas prices skyrocket as winter looms  Read more

Progressives fume as Biden Supreme Court commission seems to reject court-packing

Progressives fume as Biden Supreme Court commission seems to reject court-packing

Documents released Thursday were not final report but draft discussion materials ahead of Friday meeting  Read more

What's in Biden's plan for the IRS to monitor nearly every American's bank account?

What's in Biden's plan for the IRS to monitor nearly every American's bank account?

Biden's bank account–monitoring plan draws fierce backlash  Read more

Huge Social Security cost-of-living increase could accelerate trust's depletion

Huge Social Security cost-of-living increase could accelerate trust's depletion

Social Security cost-of-living adjustment highest since 1982  Read more

The end of shaking hands?

The end of shaking hands?

Should we go back to shaking hands as we hopefully put all of the pandemic madness behind us?  Read more